Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Effects of different hypertonic resuscitations on traumatic brain injuries and cranioencephalic trauma: A single centre, retrospective analysis

Fei Han1, Yingzhu Wang2, Zhengjie Sun1, Junyi Gu3

1Department of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China; 2Department of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China; 3Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.

For correspondence:-  Junyi Gu   Email: junyi.gu3@gmail.com   Tel:+8613565635351

Accepted: 5 February 2022        Published: 28 February 2021

Citation: Han F, Wang Y, Sun Z, Gu J. Effects of different hypertonic resuscitations on traumatic brain injuries and cranioencephalic trauma: A single centre, retrospective analysis. Trop J Pharm Res 2022; 21(2):349-358 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v21i2.18

© 2022 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacies of 3 % (w/v) hypertonic saline, 20 % (w/v) mannitol, and 10 % (w/v) mannitol plus 10 % (v/v) glycerol in the management of intracranial hypertension.
Methods: Patients with intracranial pressure > 20 mmHg received 3 % (w/v) hypertonic saline (HT cohort, n = 78) or 20 % w/v mannitol (MT cohort, n = 82) or 10 % (w/v) mannitol plus 10 % (v/v) glycerol (MG cohort, n = 73) until intracranial pressure was reduced below 15 mmHg.  Neurologic outcomes, hemodynamic parameters, and clinical biochemistry were evaluated as indices of intracranial pressure and pathological parameters.
Results: Serum sodium levels and serum osmolarity were significantly increased by 3 % (w/ v) hypertonic saline, relative to the other hypertonic resuscitations. At the end of 1 h observation period, 60 (77 %), 36 (44 %), and 41 (56 %) of patients from HT, MT, and MG cohorts, respectively, had their cerebral perfusion pressure successfully maintained at > 70 mmHg. At the end of 1 h observation period, intracranial pressure ≤ 20 mmHg was successfully maintained in 78 (100 %), 81 (99 %), and 73 (100 %) patients from HT, MT, and MG cohorts, respectively. The mean values of arterial pressure of patients in HT, MT, and MG cohorts were increased after 1 h, 15 min, and 30 min of interventions, respectively.
Conclusion: These results indicate that 3 % (w/v) hypertonic saline was the most rapid and most effective resuscitation for the management of intracranial hypertension in traumatic brain injuries or cranioencephalic trauma.

Keywords: Cerebral haemorrhage, Cerebral perfusion pressure, Hypertonic resuscitation, Intracranial pressure, Traumatic brain injury

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates